[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#429473: openoffice.org-gnome: openoffice crashes in 'Save As' dialog on entering subdirectory of samba share



Rene,

Thanks for the response. Sorry this came through twice. The first report had some typos in it. I'm glad you merged them.

Apologies also if I didn't understand the severity rating system properly. It seemed to me this bug did render the openoffice.org-gnome vfs interface unusable - although I accept smb isn't the only protocol gnome vfs provides - however as I thought it was the function of this package to provide the gnome-vfs interface, this was why I rated it as grave.

Sorry again, I don't have sid available for testing. I wasn't aware there were OO builds on backports.org, but I will try these.

Struan

on 18/06/07 13:05 Rene Engelhard wrote :
severity 429475 important
severity 429473 important
merge 429473 429475
tag 429473 + moreinfo
thanks

Struan Bartlett wrote:
  
Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch1
Justification: renders package unusable
    
Nonsense. It does not render the full office suite unusable that you
can't write to some particular place.

  
To reproduce this bug, I load oowriter, create a new empty document,
go to File->Save As and type in a samba share e.g.
'smb://machine/myshare' and hit enter.
When the samba share loads up in the dialog, I then double-click on any
subdirectory. At this point openoffice crashes with error. Sometimes it
crashes on first calling up of 'smb://machine/myshare'. The error 
message is always like e.g.:

*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0xb74f76e0 ***

N.B. I can reproduce this bug identically on two etch machines (and have
    
And on sid? And with the OOo from www.backports.org on etch?

  
Instead my guess is that we have a bug in the structures created by
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/ucpgvfs1.uno.so - which would make this an
openoffice.org-gnome bug.
    
Maybe, there at least were fixes there in the development after 2.0.4
iirc.

[ And why are you filing this two times? ]

Grüße/Regards,

René
  

Reply to: