Ariel Garcia wrote: > it came to my mind that perhaps it would be worth trying building OO "the > Debian way" but without the debian patches, as perhaps the problem lies > not on the linked libs but on some patch itself. Maybe yes. But most of those patches didn't change from 2.2.0 to 2.2.1. There were only some really minor changes needed to get them applied on 2.2.1... > I took a look at the OO-2.2.1~rc1-1.diff.gz package and i must confess i > don't quite understand what is what in those 73M (wow...!) but at least Much of the big stuff is translation updates (all the GSI*s) > the stuff in ooo-build/patches/cairo seems to be of relevance. Which didn't change from 2.2.0 to 2.2.1, and as you also wrote in the issue enabling/disabling cairo hasn't a difference here.. > If it is possible to disable at least some of those patches and have the > Debian build succeed then we could start re-adding some patches until the > problem is 'bounded'. If you find out which patch is at fault (if at all), be welcome to tell me... Gr�gards, Ren�- .''`. Ren�ngelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature