Re: 2.0?

To: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Cc: debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 2.0?
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 02:16:47 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050713231647.GG19857@rene-engelhard.de>
Mail-followup-to: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>, debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 873bqixq0m.fsf@becket.becket.net>
References: <[🔎] 873bqixq0m.fsf@becket.becket.net>

Hi,

Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> What are the plans for packaging openoffice.org 2.0?

Work in progress. There's already 1.9.114 debs in experimental. Help of
course welcome :)

Grüße/Regards,

Rene
-- 
 .''`.  Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.0?
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: 2.0?
  - From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@cs.msu.su>

References:
- 2.0?
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>

Prev by Date: 2.0?
Next by Date: Re: 2.0?
Previous by thread: 2.0?
Next by thread: Re: 2.0?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread