[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#300688: marked as done (openoffice.org: force users to install openoffice.org-l10n-en, on what basis?)



Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:58:39 +0100
with message-id <200503211058.39608.rene@debian.org>
and subject line Bug#300688: openoffice.org: force users to install openoffice.org-l10n-en, on what basis?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 07:15:53 +0000
>From yeupouinvalid@coleumes.org Sun Mar 20 23:15:52 2005
Return-path: <yeupouinvalid@coleumes.org>
Received: from attique.org (mx.attique.org) [81.56.103.59] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DDH8i-0004sd-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:15:52 -0800
Received: from eos.attique.in ([192.168.1.9])
	by mx.attique.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DDH8C-0005Sk-VP
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:15:20 +0100
Received: from moa by eos.attique.in with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1DDH8C-0001oF-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:15:20 +0100
From: Mathieu Roy <yeupouinvalid@coleumes.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: openoffice.org: force users to install openoffice.org-l10n-en, on
 what basis?
X-Debbugs-CC: Mathieu Roy <yeupouinvalid@coleumes.org>
X-GPG-Keyserver: http://pgp.mit.edu
X-GPG-Keynumber: 2DA199B9 2002-04-09
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:15:20 +0100
Message-ID: <[🔎] m3d5tto4fr.fsf@eos.attique.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: <yeupouinvalid@coleumes.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.3-7
Severity: normal

At the latest upgrade, in turned out that someone had the wonderful
idea to make openoffice.org dependant on openoffice.org-l10n-en.

On what basis? On what basis people that are not using en localization
should be forced to install these extra 4MB?





-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii  dictionaries-common [openoffi 0.24.10    Common utilities for spelling dict
ii  openoffice.org-bin            1.1.3-7    OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii  openoffice.org-debian-files   1.1.3-5+1  Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii  openoffice.org-l10n-en [openo 1.1.3-7    English (US) language package for 
ii  openoffice.org-l10n-fr [openo 1.1.3-7    French language package for OpenOf
ii  ttf-opensymbol                1.1.3-7    The OpenSymbol TrueType font

-- no debconf information

-- 
Mathieu Roy

  +
  | Thalie  : <http://yeupou.coleumes.org/> 
  | Clio    : <http://clio.coleumes.org/>       
  | Uranie  : <http://alberich.coleumes.org/>
  | Euterpe : <http://kromaniaks.coleumes.org/>
  +-----------------------------------------------------------+

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300688-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 09:59:30 +0000
>From rene@debian.org Mon Mar 21 01:59:29 2005
Return-path: <rene@debian.org>
Received: from public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com (emea3-mh.id2.novell.com) [195.33.99.129] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DDJh3-00012y-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 01:59:29 -0800
Received: from g20.suse.de
	(L4-client1.id2.novell.com [149.44.117.249])
	by emea3-mh.id2.novell.com; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:58:55 +0000
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Organization: The Debian Project
To: 300688-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#300688: openoffice.org: force users to install openoffice.org-l10n-en, on what basis?
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:58:39 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <[🔎] m3d5tto4fr.fsf@eos.attique.in>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] m3d5tto4fr.fsf@eos.attique.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200503211058.39608.rene@debian.org>
Delivered-To: 300688-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Hi,

Am Montag, 21. M=E4rz 2005 08:15 schrieb Mathieu Roy:
> At the latest upgrade, in turned out that someone had the wonderful
> idea to make openoffice.org dependant on openoffice.org-l10n-en.

This is a bogus assumption. plainly wrong.

openoffice.org *always* depended on openoffice.org-l10n-en | <some other=20
langpack>.

And the 1.1.3 stuff of course conflicts with the old 1.1.2 stuff and needs =
the=20
new 1.1.3 stuff. That the tool you used for upgrade is not able to figure=20
that out does not make this  a bug in the package...

> On what basis? On what basis people that are not using en localization
> should be forced to install these extra 4MB?

See above.

Closing the bug.

Regards,

Reme
=2D-=20
 .''`.  Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73



Reply to: