Bug#293551: openoffice.org-bin: Depends on gnomelibs.
Package: openoffice.org-bin
Severity: normal
openoffice.org-bin depends on libbonobo2-0 (>= 2.8.0)
openoffice.org-bin depends on libgnomevfs2-0 (>= 2.8.3-7)
I don't want to bloat my system with gnome-libs.
What happend to the "openoffice.org-gnomevfs" package?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers experimental
APT policy: (1001, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages openoffice.org-bin depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.42 Debian configuration management sy
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libaudio2 1.7-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
pn libbonobo2-0 Not found.
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcurl3 7.12.3-2 Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii libdb4.2++ 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries f
ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:4.0-0pre4 GCC support library
ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration database syste
ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.1-3 The GLib library of C routines
pn libgnomevfs2-0 Not found.
ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libmyspell3 1:3.1-10 MySpell spellchecking library
ii libneon23 0.23.9.dfsg.3-3 An HTTP and WebDAV client library
ii liborbit2 1:2.10.2-1.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management
ii libstartup-notification0 0.8-1 library for program launch feedbac
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libstlport4.6 4.6.2-2 STLport C++ class library
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxaw7 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Athena widget set library
ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Toolkit Intrinsics
pn openoffice.org Not found.
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
Reply to: