[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#268314: marked as done (openoffice.org: OpenOffice.org Installation requires me to accept an End User License Agreement (EULA))



Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:42:23 +0200
with message-id <200409191342.23340.rene@debian.org>
and subject line closing now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 06:00:15 +0000
>From sfllaw@debian.org Thu Aug 26 23:00:15 2004
Return-path: <sfllaw@debian.org>
Received: from cpe005004d91a8b-cm00111aded47e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (alps.law.yi.org) [69.199.110.88] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C0ZmV-0008TU-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:00:13 -0700
Received: from localhost
	([127.0.0.1] helo=germany.simon.law.yi.org ident=maildrop)
	by alps.law.yi.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1C0ZmS-0001td-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:00:08 -0400
Received: from ethiopia.simon.law.yi.org
	([192.168.83.56] helo=ethiopia ident=mail)
	by germany.simon.law.yi.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1C0Zsy-00052z-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:06:52 -0400
Received: from sfllaw by ethiopia with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1C0Zmy-0003qd-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:00:40 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Simon Law <sfllaw@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: openoffice.org: OpenOffice.org Installation requires me to accept an End
 User License Agreement (EULA)
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:00:40 -0400
Message-Id: <E1C0Zmy-0003qd-00@ethiopia>
Sender: Simon Law <sfllaw@ethiopia.simon.law.yi.org>
X-BadReturnPath: sfllaw@ethiopia.simon.law.yi.org rewritten as sfllaw@debian.org
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1

OpenOffice.org performs an installation if it's never been fired up
before.  In this installation, we see a screen that looks somewhat like
this:

  Software License Agreement:
  
  <license texts here>
  
  Please follow these steps to process with the installation:
   1. View the complete License Agreement.  Please use the
      scroll bar of the 'Page Down' button in this dialog to     Page Down
      view the entire license text.
  
   2. Accept the License Agreement
      [ ] I accept the terms of the Agreement.
  
   Print                                      << Back    Next >>   Decline

When I hit the 'Decline' button, I am asked if I wish to exit the
installation program.  But I don't want to!  I just don't wish to accept
the licenses presented:

1. Your choice of the GPL, LGPL, or the SISSL.
2. The license for Berkeley DB, a derivative of the 3-clause BSD license
3. The 3-clause BSD license itself
4. The 3-clause BSD from Harvard University
5. The International Components for Unicode license, the X11 license

All five of these licenses do not restrict the use of this software.
Yet there is a screen that forces me to accept all five of them before I
can use it.  If I never wish to modify or redistribute this software,
then I must not be compelled to accept these licenses before I can use
OpenOffice.

Please remove this screen from the installer, and the problem will go
away.  Alternatively, you could make the 'Decline' button function
exactly like the 'Next >>' button, although this would be misleading to
users.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii  dictionaries-common [openoffi 0.22.50    Common utilities for spelling dict
ii  openoffice.org-bin            1.1.2-3    OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii  openoffice.org-debian-files   1.1.2-3+1  Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii  openoffice.org-l10n-en [openo 1.1.2-3    English (US) language package for 
ii  ttf-opensymbol                1.1.2-3    The OpenSymbol TrueType font

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 268314-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2004 11:43:28 +0000
>From rene@debian.org Sun Sep 19 04:43:28 2004
Return-path: <rene@debian.org>
Received: from public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com (emea3-mh.id2.novell.com) [195.33.99.129] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C906K-0000tr-00; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 04:43:28 -0700
Received: from g20.suse.de
	(L4-client1.id2.novell.com [149.44.117.249])
	by emea3-mh.id2.novell.com; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 12:42:40 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Organization: The Debian Project
To: 268314-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing now
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:42:23 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200409191342.23340.rene@debian.org>
Delivered-To: 268314-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Hi,

I Wrote:

> Would you please explain what you did and what happened exactly ? Did you
> run /usr/lib/opneoffice/program/<whatever>. That's something what you
> shouldn't do and what indeed will show you the EULAs as upstream do. Our
> wrapper scripts do the installation in the background without showing EUL=
As.
>=20
> If I don't receive an answer in the next two days I'll close this bug...

Doing this now.

Regards,

Ren=E9



Reply to: