On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 12:38:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 03:16:35PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Steve Langasek wrote: > > > still outstanding requirement to get rid of libtiff3g for sarge. Ben > > > Burton has already expressed his willingness to NMU these packages if > > > necessary; Chris, if you are available to work on this yourself, I am of > > > course happy to work with you to get these packages ready for sarge. > > > These uploads will in any case have to wait for libtiff4 to reach sarge, > > > which should happen in two to three days once the new libtiff3g package > > > is built on all architectures. > > And kdelibs-data AGAIN caused file conflicts with > > openoffice.org-mimelnk. See > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=265852&repeatmerged=no. > > Should that be upgraded to serious and then tagged sarge-ignore since it > > only is something with KDE 3.3? > This is a serious bug, but it should be tagged sid, not sarge-ignore. A > "sid" tag will block the conflicting KDE3.3 from reaching sarge, a > "sarge-ignore" tag would let it in unimpeded. Oh, right. Yes, the bug on openoffice ought to be tagged sarge-ignore, and the bug on kde3.3 would be tagged sid. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature