Re: OpenOffice 1.1.2 finished

[Jerome Warnier <jwarnier@beeznest.net>]

On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 07:36, Olaf Leidinger wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> The new build is finished now, and seems to work. The following packages
> where created:
> 
> 
> openoffice.org_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-bin_1.1.2-3_i386.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-ca_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-cs_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-da_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-de_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-el_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-en_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-es_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-et_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-fi_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-fr_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-he_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-hi_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-hu_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-it_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-ja_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-ko_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-nb_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-ns_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-pl_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-pt_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-ru_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-sk_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-sl_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-sv_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-th_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-tr_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-zh-cn_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-zu_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-mimelnk_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-thesaurus-en-us_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-nl_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> openoffice.org-l10n-nn_1.1.2-3_all.deb
> 
> 
> But the build depends on "openoffice.org-debian-files", which wasn't
> created. This isn't normal, is it? I installed it from sid/unstable to
> solve the deps.
It is indeed a separate source package. I don't know if you would need
to rebuild it, as it wouldn't have any differences in.

> And it seems as if your ximian/gnome patchset doesn't include the
> "gtk+2.0 widget patch", which makes OO widgets look like gtk+ ones.
> Isn't it stable enough? It was at least included in the
> ximian-openoffice ebuild from gentoo and worked very well for me.
So, you just used the ximian patchset without using debian's one? I'm
not sure it is a really good idea. The best would be to use both at the
same time (or in fact, merge both patchlists).

> Ciao,
> 
> Olaf
-- 
Jerome Warnier <jwarnier@beeznest.net>
BeezNest s.a r.l.