Hi, Aiua wrote: ^^^^ btw, you have a real name? > > Anyhow, now to the real issue: > > > > How do you want to package this without the SDK available? :) > > I'm not sure i understand. > I used the SDK to compile cuckOOo, but i didn't think that it was needed to > make it run, am i wrong ? Yes, but read Debian policy: every package in main has to be rebuildable with packages in main. since the SDK isn't packaged yet your cuckooo package would belong to contrib since it needs the SDK to build... Which would be.. umm... bad... > > And: the "plain" cuckOOo version is not really working with ooo-build > > OOo's (which Debians OOo is one). Jan gave me a fixed version... > > oh ok, i didn't see any big problems using the "plain" cuckOOo version, but > that might be because i'm only at the beginning of using it and trying to > package it ;) I did. > > We probably need to build it from (and patch it in) the openoffice.org > > sourcepkg or you have to wait till we finish a openoffice.org-dev > > package (for upload to main that is..) > > ok, anyway if i can be of any help, i'd be pleased to help. When there is a openoffice.org-dev package you probably could do what you want to to... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature