Hi, Peter Naulls wrote: > In message <[🔎] 20040615114916.GA1488@rene-engelhard.de> > Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> wrote: > > > Peter Naulls wrote: > > > libneon23 suffers from the issue discussed on this page, and needs fixing accordingly > > > > > > http://people.debian.org/~keybuk/libtool-pass_all.html > > [...] > > Therfore I downgrade this bug to wishlist since it is no bug on the > > architectures we currently build libneon23* for. > > That's fine, although it is of course relatively easy to address. What Yeah. by running the libtoolize stuff in the build; patches have the disadvantage of timestamp shit although that probably could be corrected with touch... > may not be clear is that I am fact fixing OpenOffice for ARM, and this > naturally requires me to compile libneon23. I hope to have some OO > patches for you shortly. Oh, that indeed was not clear. Nice :) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature