Hi, Dick Streefland wrote: > I'm trying to rebuild the openoffice.org_1.1.0-2 source package from > sarge on a woody system. I found woody packages on > http://apt.bxlug.be/ooo/, but I cannot install them, probably because > they depend on a gnome backport. Because libfontconfig1-dev is not libart, yes. You _will_ need libart (>= 2.3.13), which is why it depends on that backport - for building and as a runtime dependency. There is now even a patch to work with .11 but then it will won't work with woody's libart version. > available for woody, I removed it from the Build-Depends: and disabled > fontconfig in debian/rules: > > - USE_FONTCONFIG=y > - CONFIGURE_FLAGS+= --enable-fontconfig > + #USE_FONTCONFIG=y > + #CONFIGURE_FLAGS+= --enable-fontconfig This is bogus. the packages (should) determine the whole thing automatically and automatically disable fontconfig in woody (although that isn't expressed in the Build-Depends:, this will be fixed in -3) > Building the package fails because some C++ header files are missing: > > Making: ../../unxlngi4.pro/slo/localfilehelper.obj > g++-3.0 -fmessage-length=0 -c -I. -I. -I../inc -I../../inc/inc > -I../../inc -I../../unx/inc -I../../unxlngi4.pro/inc -I. > -I/loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/inc/stl > -I/loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/inc/external > -I/loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/inc > -I/loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/solenv/unxlngi4/inc > -I/loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/solenv/inc > -I/loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/res > -I/loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/inc/stl > -I/loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/solenv/inc/Xp31 -INO_JAVA_HOME/include > -INO_JAVA_HOME/include/linux > -INO_JAVA_HOME/include/native_threads/include -I/usr/X11R6/include > -I. -I../../res -I. -g1 -O1 -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -fno-for-scope > -fpermissive -fno-rtti -include preinclude.h -fexceptions > -fno-enforce-eh-specs -fpic -DLINUX -DUNX -DVCL -DGCC -DC300 -DINTEL > -DCVER=C300 -D_USE_NAMESPACE -DGLIBC=2 -DX86 -D_PTHREADS -D_REENTRANT > -DNEW_SOLAR -D_USE_NAMESPACE=1 -DSTLPORT_VERSION=400 -D__DMAKE -DUNIX > -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -DSUPD=645 -DPRODUCT -DNDEBUG -DPRODUCT_FULL > -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DOPTIMIZE -DEXCEPTIONS_ON -DCUI -DSRX645 > -DSHAREDLIB -D_DLL_ -DMULTITHREAD -o > ../../unxlngi4.pro/slo/localfilehelper.o > /loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/unotools/source/ucbhelper/localfilehelper.cxx > In file included from /loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/unotools/source/ucbhelper/localfilehelper.cxx:73: > ../../inc/unotools/localfilehelper.hxx:71:28: tools/string.hxx: No such file or directory > In file included from /loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/unotools/source/ucbhelper/localfilehelper.cxx:75: > /loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/inc/ucbhelper/contentbroker.hxx:101: warning: `class ucb::ContentBroker' only defines private constructors and has no friends > /loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/unotools/source/ucbhelper/localfilehelper.cxx:78:27: tools/debug.hxx: No such file or directory > /loc/oo/openoffice.org-1.1.0/unotools/source/ucbhelper/localfilehelper.cxx:79:26: tools/list.hxx: No such file or directory > ... etc. Hmm. Interesting. > What is missing here? Is it feasible to build openoffice 1.1 on a woody > system? Yes. I know Jérôme did and Chris had some ready although there were some problems to be sorted out there.. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature