Bug#174492: marked as done (openoffice.org-bin: /usr/lib/openoffice/program is missing from /etc/ld.so.conf)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Dec 2002 21:58:52 +0100
with message-id <20021227205852.GB10494@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Bug#174492: openoffice.org-bin: /usr/lib/openoffice/program is missing from /etc/ld.so.conf
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2002 19:56:27 +0000
>From toma@mlf.linux.rulez.org Fri Dec 27 13:56:27 2002
Return-path: <toma@mlf.linux.rulez.org>
Received: from mlf.linux.rulez.org [192.188.244.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18S0ao-0006aR-00; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:56:26 -0600
Received: by mlf.linux.rulez.org (Postfix, from userid 1015)
id ABC788B972; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 20:56:25 +0100 (CET)
From: Szerb Tamas <toma@mlf.linux.rulez.org>
Subject: openoffice.org-bin: /usr/lib/openoffice/program is missing from /etc/ld.so.conf
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <20021227195625.ABC788B972@mlf.linux.rulez.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 20:56:25 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openoffice.org-bin
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
and needed by the openoffice binaries (other solution might be the LD_*
environment variables)
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux mlf 2.4.18 #1 Tue Jun 25 14:55:24 CEST 2002 i586 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 174492-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2002 21:01:13 +0000
>From rene@debian.org Fri Dec 27 15:01:12 2002
Return-path: <rene@debian.org>
Received: from ping-ef-gw.ping.de (noefs.ping.de) [62.72.90.14] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18S1bU-00033b-00; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:01:12 -0600
Received: from [10.11.11.81] (helo=stan)
by noefs.ping.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18S1bR-000109-00; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 22:01:09 +0100
Received: by stan (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D718277573; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 21:58:52 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 21:58:52 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
To: Szerb Tamas <toma@mlf.linux.rulez.org>,
174492-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#174492: openoffice.org-bin: /usr/lib/openoffice/program is missing from /etc/ld.so.conf
Message-ID: <20021227205852.GB10494@rene-engelhard.de>
References: <20021227195625.ABC788B972@mlf.linux.rulez.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021227195625.ABC788B972@mlf.linux.rulez.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger rene@db.debian.org
Delivered-To: 174492-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.2 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Szerb Tamas wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-bin
> Version: N/A
> Severity: normal
>=20
> and needed by the openoffice binaries (other solution might be the LD_*
> environment variables)
Eh, we have wrapper scripts for openoffice and regcomp in
/usr/bin. They set the LD_* environment variables properly.
The reason why these libs are not in /etc/ld.so.conf is that upstream
IIRC hasn't taken care of namespace clashes and compatibility
problems. So we keep these libraries "private".
Closing the bug.
Regards,
Rene
>=20
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> Kernel Version: Linux mlf 2.4.18 #1 Tue Jun 25 14:55:24 CEST 2002 i586 un=
known
>=20
>=20
>=20
--=20
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+DL8M+FmQsCSK63MRAs8SAJ98JTLE0+7Usp+qZC6iiBMbY1E4FQCePVVm
GCcSZNZoLCpiiucvr3+Z6xw=
=mCnQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y--
Reply to: