Re: package name
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 14:38:22 +0200
Chris Halls <chris.halls@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 02:48:42PM -0400, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > [...] It is desirable to keep dots out of package
> > names because it is desirable to name configuration files
> > after packages,
>
> I'm not sure that /etc/oo or /etc/ooo is obviously openoffice, even if
> people are aware of the abbreviation.
I'm just a simple debian user and i don't think that the oo and especially the ooo abbreviations are obvious. I think the package name should include office in it's name so "ordinary" people can recognize. Just the users point of view.
--
*----------------------------------------------------------------*
| .''`. | Filipe Maia |
| : :' : | email: fmaia@gmx.net |
| `. `'` | |
| `- | Debian GNU/Linux: <http://www.debian.org> |
*----------------------------------------------------------------*
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: