Bug#1131638: bisect-ppx: FTBFS: Error: Unbound value Cmdliner.Term.eval_choice
Package: src:bisect-ppx
Version: 2.8.3+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs forky sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build.
Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most
relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log
is available here:
https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202603/
About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS,
using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages.
If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I
am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is
fully reproducible.
If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use
reassign and add an affects on src:bisect-ppx, so that this is still
visible in the BTS web page for this package.
Thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --with ocaml --buildsystem ocaml_dune
dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune
dune clean
dh_autoreconf_clean -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune
dh_ocamlclean -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune
rm -f ocamlinit-stamp debian/libbisect-ppx-ocaml.install debian/libbisect-ppx-ocaml-dev.install
dh_clean -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune
rm -f debian/debhelper-build-stamp
rm -rf debian/.debhelper/
rm -f -- debian/libbisect-ppx-ocaml.substvars debian/libbisect-ppx-ocaml-dev.substvars debian/files
rm -fr -- debian/libbisect-ppx-ocaml/ debian/tmp/ debian/libbisect-ppx-ocaml-dev/
find . \( \( \
\( -path .\*/.git -o -path .\*/.svn -o -path .\*/.bzr -o -path .\*/.hg -o -path .\*/CVS -o -path .\*/.pc -o -path .\*/_darcs \) -prune -o -type f -a \
\( -name '#*#' -o -name '.*~' -o -name '*~' -o -name DEADJOE \
-o -name '*.orig' -o -name '*.rej' -o -name '*.bak' \
-o -name '.*.orig' -o -name .*.rej -o -name '.SUMS' \
-o -name TAGS -o \( -path '*/.deps/*' -a -name '*.P' \) \
\) -exec rm -f {} + \) -o \
\( -type d -a \( -name autom4te.cache -o -name __pycache__ \) -prune -exec rm -rf {} + \) \)
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with ocaml --buildsystem ocaml_dune
dh_update_autotools_config -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune
dh_autoreconf -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune
dh_ocamlinit -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune
sed -e 's%@OCamlABI@%5.4.0%g' -e 's%@OCamlStdlibDir@%/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ocaml/5.4.0%g' -e 's%@OCamlDllDir@%/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ocaml/5.4.0/stublibs%g' -e 's/^OPT: //' -e '/^BYTE: /d' -e 's/^DYN: //' debian/libbisect-ppx-ocaml.install.in > debian/libbisect-ppx-ocaml.install
sed -e 's%@OCamlABI@%5.4.0%g' -e 's%@OCamlStdlibDir@%/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ocaml/5.4.0%g' -e 's%@OCamlDllDir@%/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ocaml/5.4.0/stublibs%g' -e 's/^OPT: //' -e '/^BYTE: /d' -e 's/^DYN: //' debian/libbisect-ppx-ocaml-dev.install.in > debian/libbisect-ppx-ocaml-dev.install
touch ocamlinit-stamp
dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune
debian/rules execute_before_dh_auto_build
make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
uglifyjs -m -c -o src/vendor/highlight.js/highlight.pack.js \
debian/missing-sources/highlight.js
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune
dune build -j 2 -p bisect_ppx
(cd _build/default && /usr/bin/ocamlc.opt -w -40 -g -bin-annot -bin-annot-occurrences -I src/report/.main.eobjs/byte -I /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ocaml/5.4.0/cmdliner -I /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ocaml/5.4.0/unix -I src/common/.bisect_common.objs/byte -no-alias-deps -open Dune__exe -o src/report/.main.eobjs/byte/dune__exe__Main.cmo -c -impl src/report/main.ml)
File "src/report/main.ml", line 35, characters 20-45:
35 | let eval_choice = Cmdliner.Term.eval_choice [@ocaml.warning "-3"]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Error: Unbound value Cmdliner.Term.eval_choice
dh_auto_build: error: dune build -j 2 -p bisect_ppx returned exit code 1
make: *** [debian/rules:10: binary] Error 25
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess failed with exit status 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: