[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lem_2022-12-10+dfsg2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED



Hello,

On Thu 05 Sep 2024 at 11:23pm +08, Bo YU wrote:

> But you suggest me to apply LGPL-2.1+-with-linking-exception for
> ocaml-lib/pmap* and ocaml-lib/pset.*, I am not sure when I look at
> these files again. For example, the copyright from
> ocaml-lib/pmap.ml[2]

I'm suggesting it from looking at the file headers themselves.  Don't
they say it has the exception too?

> Thanks for reminding this again. Here I have one question that needs
> to be verified. Taking these files as an example[4], could we convert
> into [5]?

Yes, that's fine.  I know what you mean about amplifying rights claims,
but copyright is not the same as an AUTHORS file saying who made the
most substantive contributions.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: