[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1073899: marked as done (FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Configure script misdetects unix))

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 06:21:50 +0000
with message-id <E1scJ0Y-002SKw-4b@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1073899: fixed in ocaml-obuild 0.1.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073899,
regarding FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Configure script misdetects unix)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1073899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073899
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: ocaml-obuild
Version: 0.1.11-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ocaml-5.2.0-transition

Dear Maintainer,

Your package FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 for the following reason:

  Configure script misdetects unix

A full log is available at:

  http://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-5.2.0/pool/ocaml-obuild.log

A repository with all relevant packages recompiled with OCaml 5.2.0 is
available at the following address:

  http://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-5.2.0/


Cheers,

-- 
Stephane

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: ocaml-obuild
Source-Version: 0.1.11-2
Done: Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ocaml-obuild, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1073899@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org> (supplier of updated ocaml-obuild package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 07:46:20 +0200
Source: ocaml-obuild
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org>
Closes: 1073899
Changes:
 ocaml-obuild (0.1.11-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   * Add libfindlib-ocaml to Build-Depends (Closes: #1073899)
Checksums-Sha1:
 5f72d52000efba316016ef449acb203c7345e27d 1838 ocaml-obuild_0.1.11-2.dsc
 a15fcb98d4bd679df27996ca84ab8a2a65a92f09 3780 ocaml-obuild_0.1.11-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 a1fc5ad1aa08b6480c21a341f6037b7e098542b03b4b12b1c2ccf88314672864 1838 ocaml-obuild_0.1.11-2.dsc
 949d461e273d1391c8531919233cc424a5987e39b1c503470abcaa71f6daad92 3780 ocaml-obuild_0.1.11-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 10535af278c2557ceb03f5c8577b6b7c 1838 ocaml optional ocaml-obuild_0.1.11-2.dsc
 82e961772108d38bd881cc71b0fbb552 3780 ocaml optional ocaml-obuild_0.1.11-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFGBAEBCgAwFiEEbeJOl+yohsxW5iUOIbju8bGJMIEFAma1rasSHGdsb25kdUBk
ZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJECG47vGxiTCBPysIAIy6rDzpFwf9TyXm813An2JT2o8FkTz5
QHJpZrqTuelzwPR68JU+a1BeYnliNOjXa/HEUt7JSmlSInir1bG49i1EM6WNr5S4
7rFsu3Q/ue6j/KKihYKpaGL5LcsPecgWXw19FKzQnW8b9eAhaPFMM9je/+TkuA+a
68jikwi1cYu0zDSK5OMKZy2Ud5JI/pPwGAsUHDwGchfnGC6ci3j5aatYCr8NJXx3
+wz7Jz5ygdkfCMj3nwEpNYPtHX43rQSqvoGbhbA3Fil4N6lhYY+6oSVO1z02dc0e
RrPARyAjAHJLhV6LHN8pm2wCU/CZPXP+pf19/pyK/guefC0ElPowq+U=
=6tSp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpIJERdzwIWB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: