[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

ocaml-conduit_6.2.0-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable



Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



Accepted:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 09:26:26 +0200
Source: ocaml-conduit
Architecture: source
Version: 6.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Julien Puydt <jpuydt@debian.org>
Changes:
 ocaml-conduit (6.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Fix d/watch.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.2.
   * New upstream release.
   * Fix compilation with recent dune
Checksums-Sha1:
 97e5efb4050b8486771bfdaf6f795191a1dc8598 2446 ocaml-conduit_6.2.0-1.dsc
 e646d85e171ee5a3f84661d203e93566f8336ca4 42244 ocaml-conduit_6.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 6b5c1909ec2242645a8a2cea2a2129a83f070785 2728 ocaml-conduit_6.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 8570c8030ab1be87b8bb51d66f030859557ff068 10284 ocaml-conduit_6.2.0-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 f6efd1135db7ff71adabe648d1e1f3890bc3341504eed155003b6d4793b1479f 2446 ocaml-conduit_6.2.0-1.dsc
 0b1a533998430a971b563dfcc49eb7c97ba11d8226d872879f5b93ea54ef067e 42244 ocaml-conduit_6.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 0ad0e7234b1ceb4e54d0fdbc98f7b0b2e890d90fa50a66a08d59d7b91b932258 2728 ocaml-conduit_6.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 ba0da2c1adc95b167386a86d3023cae41fd7c70a05d6f58755d093a706fed991 10284 ocaml-conduit_6.2.0-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 730de0b58f78be0798ef73533b7dc93a 2446 ocaml optional ocaml-conduit_6.2.0-1.dsc
 6551b9ad007fd7e3bd7f3d9b9effad6e 42244 ocaml optional ocaml-conduit_6.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 4323ca5562f18f473999e25a768ea506 2728 ocaml optional ocaml-conduit_6.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 aa35aa44382c42aa338c153571db24a6 10284 ocaml optional ocaml-conduit_6.2.0-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Rsib
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: