[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1039115: marked as done (ppx-assert FTBFS on bytecode architectures)



Your message dated Mon, 26 Jun 2023 03:48:52 +0000
with message-id <E1qDdDg-00D4sL-2A@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1039115: fixed in ppx-assert 0.16.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1039115,
regarding ppx-assert FTBFS on bytecode architectures
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1039115: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039115
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ppx-assert
Version: 0.16.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ppx-assert&ver=0.16.0-1

...
   dh_install -a
dh_install: warning: Cannot find (any matches for) "/usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_assert/*.a" (tried in ., debian/tmp)

dh_install: warning: libppx-assert-ocaml-dev missing files: /usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_assert/*.a
dh_install: warning: Cannot find (any matches for) "/usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_assert/runtime-lib/*.a" (tried in ., debian/tmp)

dh_install: warning: libppx-assert-ocaml-dev missing files: /usr/lib/ocaml/ppx_assert/runtime-lib/*.a
dh_install: error: missing files, aborting
make: *** [debian/rules:6: binary-arch] Error 25

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ppx-assert
Source-Version: 0.16.0-2
Done: Julien Puydt <jpuydt@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ppx-assert, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1039115@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Puydt <jpuydt@debian.org> (supplier of updated ppx-assert package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 05:30:51 +0200
Source: ppx-assert
Architecture: source
Version: 0.16.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Julien Puydt <jpuydt@debian.org>
Closes: 1039115
Changes:
 ppx-assert (0.16.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix compilation on bytecode architectures (Closes: #1039115).
Checksums-Sha1:
 046cd53280650b4300dd83c888076a817937b16d 2226 ppx-assert_0.16.0-2.dsc
 7fd6ed62057bf6f84d8c2205ecc0ff8004c5fbf4 2204 ppx-assert_0.16.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 88b9ab2a805223999a6e302dbda56acfa2d6d9dd 7268 ppx-assert_0.16.0-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 5323dc2771754f5d51d8da9f8f83714fe73fdd3058a34409cf3e35fc07f8479c 2226 ppx-assert_0.16.0-2.dsc
 a2ab673764272b4b17f8319c2c8f3ae8c2eb4bce0761d94862e7166e17eab4a7 2204 ppx-assert_0.16.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 3e75ff30484eaf6d3d35cb85be74ecb71efd27790127d64aeb99950c84776f0d 7268 ppx-assert_0.16.0-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 730cc2b0fbca429bfe58e45f288c8192 2226 ocaml optional ppx-assert_0.16.0-2.dsc
 b6d0ea6fee600878b90b02f3f20d425c 2204 ocaml optional ppx-assert_0.16.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 fa629c59ff4690d6e79a2af90db279b8 7268 ocaml optional ppx-assert_0.16.0-2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=xaAD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: