[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#741535: marked as done (libssreflect-coq: please Provide: an ABI)

Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:35:05 +0200
with message-id <49817a9ac55427be1bd5ce3bc3b299a56c97463e.camel@gmail.com>
and subject line Using dh-coq fixes those issues
has caused the Debian Bug report #741535,
regarding libssreflect-coq: please Provide: an ABI
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
741535: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=741535
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libssreflect-coq
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer, packages building coq libraries on top of ssreflect
will depend on the md5 sum of the .vo files shipped by this package.
There checksums change when Coq is updated, OCaml is updated, ssreflect is
updated... Adding an ABI will force us to do a binnmu to avoid distributing a
package that installs but whose contents cannot be loaded by Coq.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libssreflect-coq depends on:
ii  coq [coq-8.4pl3+4.01.0]  8.4pl3dfsg-1
ii  libssreflect-ocaml       1.5-1

libssreflect-coq recommends no packages.

libssreflect-coq suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

since I wrote dh-coq and started using it for all coq-related packages,
we do have an ABI that will avoid future breakages.

Cheers,

J.Puydt

--- End Message ---
Reply to: