[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#885677: marked as done (liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml: Depends on unmaintained gtksourceview2)

Your message dated Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:21:11 +0000
with message-id <E1k1RDz-0001vC-Q5@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#885677: fixed in lablgtk2 2.18.8+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #885677,
regarding liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml: Depends on unmaintained gtksourceview2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
885677: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885677
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml
Version: 2.18.5+dfsg-1
Severity: important
User: pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: oldlibs gtksourceview2
Tags: sid buster

As announced [1], we do not intend to release Debian 10 "Buster" with
the old libgnome (and related) libraries. These libraries have been
deprecated and unmaintained for several years.

Your package depends on gtksourceview2 which has not had a release
since 2010.

Your package has these reverse-depends in Debian (via
liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml-dev package)

- alt-ergo
- coq
- frama-c
- lablgtk-extras
- laby
- marionnet
- why3

Please port your package to GTK3 and gtksourceview3 and related
maintained libraries. Otherwise, please consider requesting that your
package be removed from Debian to help us complete this goal.

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/10/msg00299.html

On behalf of the Debian GNOME team,
Jeremy Bicha

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: lablgtk2
Source-Version: 2.18.8+dfsg-2
Done: =?utf-8?q?St=C3=A9phane_Glondu?= <glondu@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lablgtk2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 885677@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org> (supplier of updated lablgtk2 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:42:42 +0200
Source: lablgtk2
Architecture: source
Version: 2.18.8+dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org>
Closes: 885677 957413
Changes:
 lablgtk2 (2.18.8+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix compilation with gcc-10 (Closes: #957413)
   * Build without gtksourceview2 (Closes: #885677)
   * Bump debhelper compat level to 13
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.0
   * Add Rules-Requires-Root: no
Checksums-Sha1:
 8267a71cf4457c9e76c0ca07953d52a5b14c0b8d 2405 lablgtk2_2.18.8+dfsg-2.dsc
 8126eefe7fe2eb24c8a37b61ca4c9f90985ef185 10520 lablgtk2_2.18.8+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 c1de00a1433f41c1a6e0327676da5ce94cd003695fb283c40ad01201c969880b 2405 lablgtk2_2.18.8+dfsg-2.dsc
 be74a73d330d6cbf18afc073fab997fec96ee702570173e922d8b71f9c872e74 10520 lablgtk2_2.18.8+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 4e008d99d9ab14952aaf56fd5a592f21 2405 ocaml optional lablgtk2_2.18.8+dfsg-2.dsc
 4bc5068639a1e26aef6e06a239dfdc55 10520 ocaml optional lablgtk2_2.18.8+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEbeJOl+yohsxW5iUOIbju8bGJMIEFAl8j2ZwACgkQIbju8bGJ
MIF2Gwf9G82xbKNZFVsHcg4eTK9YDzcTlYwjCFfC6+ZEVE2qKM4qiIt8MxeA5Rfv
grWhYGh080uOvbdf/h/8c7pREqsQXF/gsmXeC67vyH9rVh/m+rLNGa4ovsRv/WG1
NhdsfzGhFUIJIeHRv29nDpJG4CLEIKMQ0KKbQWVKMiPU+6O4GVNVp53OERY6COyC
AOHsD4+wY9ixrdRMOZd9e1Jm02tXzZZPShB4R1ulL2HON0bCqXqIovxANqO2O4zh
q3VfajiBwkpgMiaNNAK+b99GO6uNjPc1Q2Su+QPu6HL2Rw6jUwgnPLOr+1j3rNQb
lDNRSc+Z5g7FK3aixZrhW2SZyn1Vtg==
=djV9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: