Bug#823906: [Dose-devel] apt-cudf: unable to find a solution with an out-of-date chroot
- To: 823906@bugs.debian.org, dose-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr, deity@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#823906: [Dose-devel] apt-cudf: unable to find a solution with an out-of-date chroot
- From: Johannes Schauer <josch@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 15:52:36 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20160511135236.9172.69814@localhost>
- Mail-followup-to: Pietro Abate <pietro.abate@inria.fr>, 823906@bugs.debian.org, Pietro Abate <pietro.abate@inria.fr>, dose-devel@lists.gforge.inria.fr, 823906@bugs.debian.org, deity@lists.debian.org,
- Reply-to: Johannes Schauer <josch@debian.org>, 823906@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20160511114521.GA31153@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
- References: <20160510185131.GB11716@seneca.home.org> <20160510190903.GA14685@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <20160510191801.GD11716@seneca.home.org> <20160511055447.9172.77261@localhost> <[🔎] 20160511110153.9172.30628@localhost> <[🔎] 20160511114521.GA31153@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Hi,
Quoting Pietro Abate (2016-05-11 13:45:21)
> What's about 2.a , listing all remove actions before the install actions, so
> we won't effectively change the out-out of apt-cudf, but apt-get won't get
> confused as only the action will be considered (as I understand the problem
> is in the order in which actions are read by apt-get). I admit this is a bit
> fragile and needs to be documented properly as part of the specification.
yes, this would work in practice.
It just doesn't seem right in principle that the solution presented to apt by
apt-cudf does depend on the order it is presented. The order should not matter.
Thanks!
cheers, josch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature
Reply to: