[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#690328: marked as done (All links in documentation's index.html are broken)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2014 17:13:33 +0200
with message-id <20140720151333.GB32601@nu.ryanak.ca>
and subject line Re: Bug#690328: All links in documentation's index.html are broken
has caused the Debian Bug report #690328,
regarding All links in documentation's index.html are broken
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690328: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690328
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libssreflect-coq
Version: 1.4-1
Severity: normal

All of the links (well, the dozen or so I've tried to follow, excluding
the alphabetical ones at the very top) in
/usr/share/doc/libssreflect-coq/html/index.html are broken.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_CA.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libssreflect-coq depends on:
ii  coq [coq-8.4+3.12.1]  8.4dfsg-2
ii  libssreflect-ocaml    1.4-1

libssreflect-coq recommends no packages.

libssreflect-coq suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
fixed 690328 1.5-1
thanks

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 08:52:10AM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Is that still true? I just tried with 1.5~rc1-2 and I couldn't find
> broken links. Maybe it was just fixed meanwhile...

Everything seems to be fixed, thanks!

Best wishes,
Ryan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: