Re: Bits from the Release Team: Final countdown!
On 06/22/2012 08:51 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> ygrek <ygrek@autistici.org> writes:
>
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:56:51 +0200 Stéphane Glondu
>> <glondu@debian.org> wrote:
>>
>>> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
In general, packages marked "RFA" are those without a dedicated human
>>> maintainer, and might be in bad shape. There are not a lot of
>>> these currently, but it might change in the future.
>>>
>>> Packages that have not been updated in a while (same version in
>>> stable and testing) might also deserve a look. It can be seen in
>>> the DDPO as well.
>>>
>>> New upstream versions (if debian/watch is up-to-date) are also
>>> available in the "Watch" columns, but it's too late now to
>>> initiate big transitions...
>>
>> Just checked ocaml-extunix there. It shows upstream version 0.0.4,
>> while the latest version is really 0.0.5 and it contains a fix for
>> potential crash (quite unlikely, but still) with ocaml 4.00. Watch
>> page says that it is up-to-date :
>> http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=ocaml-extunix but same page
>> yaml output says newer version available :
>> http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/udd-dehs?pkg=ocaml-extunix Thought I'd
>> better let you know. Thanks for all your work!
>
> On that note it would also be really helpfull to get oasis 0.3 (even
> an RC) in. Anyone in contact with Sylvain Le Gall?
>
He said (yesterday, on irc#debian-ocaml) he will release/upload oasis
0.3. But I don't see the point of releasing 0.3rc with Wheezy.
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
Reply to: