Re: Bits from the Release Team: Final countdown!
ygrek <ygrek@autistici.org> writes:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:56:51 +0200
> Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
>>
>> In general, packages marked "RFA" are those without a dedicated human
>> maintainer, and might be in bad shape. There are not a lot of these
>> currently, but it might change in the future.
>>
>> Packages that have not been updated in a while (same version in stable
>> and testing) might also deserve a look. It can be seen in the DDPO as well.
>>
>> New upstream versions (if debian/watch is up-to-date) are also available
>> in the "Watch" columns, but it's too late now to initiate big transitions...
>
> Just checked ocaml-extunix there. It shows upstream version 0.0.4, while the latest
> version is really 0.0.5 and it contains a fix for potential crash (quite unlikely, but still)
> with ocaml 4.00.
> Watch page says that it is up-to-date : http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=ocaml-extunix
> but same page yaml output says newer version available : http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/udd-dehs?pkg=ocaml-extunix
> Thought I'd better let you know. Thanks for all your work!
On that note it would also be really helpfull to get oasis 0.3 (even an
RC) in. Anyone in contact with Sylvain Le Gall?
MfG
Goswin
Reply to: