Re: Bits from the Release Team: Final countdown!
On 06/22/2012 07:41 PM, ygrek wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:56:51 +0200 Stéphane Glondu
> <glondu@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
In general, packages marked "RFA" are those without a dedicated human
>> maintainer, and might be in bad shape. There are not a lot of these
>> currently, but it might change in the future.
>>
>> Packages that have not been updated in a while (same version in
>> stable and testing) might also deserve a look. It can be seen in
>> the DDPO as well.
>>
>> New upstream versions (if debian/watch is up-to-date) are also
>> available in the "Watch" columns, but it's too late now to
>> initiate big transitions...
>
> Just checked ocaml-extunix there. It shows upstream version 0.0.4,
> while the latest version is really 0.0.5 and it contains a fix for
> potential crash (quite unlikely, but still) with ocaml 4.00.
So not critical for Wheezy which ships 3.12.1 no? :)
In any case, I'm well aware of this new upstream release. I intended to
package it for Wheezy (as it mainly brings fixes).
> Watch page says that it is up-to-date :
> http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=ocaml-extunix but same page
> yaml output says newer version available :
> http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/udd-dehs?pkg=ocaml-extunix Thought I'd
> better let you know. Thanks for all your work!
>
Yeah, those pages tend to be outdated... or are not run often, or...
never managed to ask why.
Thanks for your mail!
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
Reply to: