Processed: Re: Bug#670733: Some remarks
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 670733 important
Bug #670733 [src:ocaml-cry] ocaml-cry: FTBFS: Incorrectly thinks it's building as root
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> severity 672673 important
Bug #672673 [src:ocaml-soundtouch] ocaml-soundtouch: FTBFS: Incorrectly thinks it's building as root
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> severity 672666 important
Bug #672666 [src:ocaml-duppy] ocaml-duppy: FTBFS: Incorrectly thinks it's building as root
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> severity 672667 important
Bug #672667 [src:ocaml-gstreamer] ocaml-gstreamer: FTBFS: Incorrectly thinks it's building as root
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> severity 672668 important
Bug #672668 [src:ocaml-ladspa] ocaml-ladspa: FTBFS: Incorrectly thinks it's building as root
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> severity 672669 important
Bug #672669 [src:ocaml-lame] ocaml-lame: FTBFS: Incorrectly thinks it's building as root
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> severity 672670 important
Bug #672670 [src:ocaml-mad] ocaml-mad: FTBFS: Incorrectly thinks it's building as root
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> severity 672671 important
Bug #672671 [src:ocaml-mm] ocaml-mm: FTBFS: Incorrectly thinks it's building as root
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
670733: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670733
672666: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672666
672667: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672667
672668: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672668
672669: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672669
672670: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672670
672671: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672671
672673: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672673
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Reply to: