[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#345793: marked as done (mldonkey: fails to build on alpha)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:20:31 +0200
with message-id <4F8BE45F.9010308@debian.org>
and subject line Native compiler no longer supported on ia64 and alpha
has caused the Debian Bug report #345793,
regarding mldonkey: fails to build on alpha
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
345793: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=345793
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: mldonkey
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

Hi,

the build fails when building mlnet with what looks like
http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3072.
You should probably build mlnet with ocamlc to work around this.
By the way, the build continues even if mlnet fails to build, which is
not a good thing as it makes it harder to detect failures.
The build log is available at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=mldonkey&ver=2.7.1-2&arch=alpha&stamp=1136182912&file=log&as=raw

Cheers,
Julien Cristau

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Native compilation support for ia64 and alpha have been dropped
upstream, and it is unlikely that they are resurrected one day. Hence,
closing related bugreports.

-- 
Stéphane

--- End Message ---
Reply to: