Re: Bug#663754: ITP: hol-light -- HOL Light theorem prover
- To: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#663754: ITP: hol-light -- HOL Light theorem prover
- From: Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 17:46:06 +0200
- Message-id: <4F80613E.4030003@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <6xbonj3h41.fsf@blau.inf.tu-dresden.de>
- References: <87pqcg44ot.fsf@wallace.tews.net> <CAFShwkhv8v=90JV0YHe55HtcH5JvPgyZsAHg2aoPv0kb2sM=dA@mail.gmail.com> <20319.46999.708579.851862@blau.inf.tu-dresden.de> <20323.6066.37102.182560@blau.inf.tu-dresden.de> <6xbonj3h41.fsf@blau.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Sorry for taking so much time to reply...
Le 26/03/2012 10:23, Hendrik Tews a écrit :
> I believe I fixed all the issues in the package hol-light.
> [...]
It looks good from a technical point of view. However:
- Jordan/float.ml is copyright Thomas C. Hales, and under a different
license (GPL). This should be mentioned in debian/copyright.
- There are many other copyright holders that appear in "git grep -i
copyright" output and don't appear in debian/copyright. It looks like
lots of them are distributed under the same license terms as HOL
Light, so it should be fine... but I'd add "and others" after John
Harrison's name. However, please check the licenses and make explicit
in debian/copyright files that are under a different license
- Putting your packaging work under GPL makes your patches GPL, which
would make me reluctant to merge them if I were upstream. Is that
intentional? The general practice is to put debian/* under the same
license(s) as upstream, as if it could be merged upstream.
- Please refer to:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
in the Format field of debian/copyright.
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
Reply to: