[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[mihamina@bbs.mg: [Caml-list] Ocaml Debian team (Was: Best platform for Ocsigen 1.91)]



JFYI, in case you missed it.
(sounds a tiny teeny bit FUD-ish, in need of debunking)

----- Forwarded message from Mihamina Rakotomandimby <mihamina@bbs.mg> -----

Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:21:19 +0300
From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby <mihamina@bbs.mg>
To: ocsigen@sympa.mancoosi.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Ocaml Debian team (Was: Best platform for Ocsigen 1.91)

[ X-Post to the OCaml list]

> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:34:00 +0200
> Stéphane Glondu <steph@glondu.net> wrote:
> Le 14/06/2011 15:30, Gabriel Scherer a écrit :
> > [...] the debian ocaml maintainer team is very large [...]
> This is not true, and we would welcome more manpower.

I agree: :-)
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2010/07/msg00102.html

My humble opinion is the team is a bit restrictive.
Anyway, that is quite fair for good QA. 
It's too bad to fall into the Ubuntu way (poor QA).

Just curious:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/OCamlTaskForce
Are there "only" 3 active members right now?

-- 
RMA.


-- 
Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Quando anche i santi ti voltano le spalle, |  .  |. I've fans everywhere
ti resta John Fante -- V. Capossela .......| ..: |.......... -- C. Adams

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: