Re: names of distribution-branches in the git repository
On 22-11-2010, Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org> wrote:
> On 22/11/2010 15:15, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
>
> I'm not sure it's relevant then. I would not keep the history if I'm
> reworking from scratch. ymmv
>
>>> I'm not sure that we should enforce anything on how/from what the
>>> branches were created here.
>>>
>>>> - set debian/gbp.conf accordingly (upstream-branch and
>>>> debian-branch)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why? or did you forget to add "in $distrib/debian"?
>>
>> I mean that we should add/change upstream-branch = upstream to
>> upstream-branch = $distrib/upstream
>>
>> and debian-branch = master to debian-branch = $distrib/master
>>
>
> Yeah, I did understand that. But, I wouldn't not commit that on "master".
> The default remains "sid", IMHO.
I am talking about a commit in $distrib/master not master.
Regards,
Sylvain Le Gall
Reply to: