Re: names of distribution-branches in the git repository
On 21/11/2010 22:53, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 20/11/2010 12:05, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
>> I suggest that we add to the dom packaging reference that branches
>> intended for primary release into a distribution should be named like
>> that distribution, that is experimental, squeeze, whatever-backport,
>> etc, with the exception that the branch for sid is called master.
>> Does that sound reasonable?
>
> My own practice is to use git-buildpackage's defaults (master,
> upstream) for unstable, and prefix them by "experimental/" (e.g.
> experimental/master and experimental/upstream) for experimental. For
> $codename, I would similarly create $codename/master and
> $codename/upstream. I'd like to see this adopted by the team.
>
I like that (I was actually thinking about that in my original mail by got
them reversed :p thanks for fixing my mind :)).
Cheers,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
Reply to: