also sprach Sylvain Le Gall <gildor@debian.org> [2010.11.03.1838 +0100]:
> I am not sure to understand what you ask. Hardlinks and copies are not
> the same thing. AFAIU, if you hardlink a file to a different filename
> and make a change to one of these files, it will also appear in the
> other file. You don't have this effect with copies. If the remote file
> is not an hardlink, there is no point making the local file an hardlink.
You are right. I guess what I am looking for is the ability to
synchronise hardlinks with unison.
Otoh, an option to hardlink identical files on either side of the
sync might be useful.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."
-- voltaire
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)