[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#574887: ocsigen: Put XHTML.M in its own binary package



Package: ocsigen
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: minor

Hello,

When a user wants to generate an HTML page using XHTML.M, he has to
install libocsigen-ocaml-dev which brings a lot of dependencies.

Would it be possible to split it in a new binary package provinding
only XHTML.M to ease its installation and use?

Cheers,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages ocsigen depends on:
ii  adduser                3.112             add and remove users and groups
ii  libc6                  2.10.2-6          Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libfindlib-ocaml [libf 1.2.5+debian-1+b1 library for managing OCaml librari
ii  liblwt-ocaml [liblwt-o 2.0.0-1+b3        cooperative light-weight thread li
ii  libocamlnet-ocaml [lib 2.2.9-7+b2        OCaml application-level Internet l
ii  libocsigen-ocaml [libo 1.2.2-1+b2        runtime librairies for Ocsigen
ii  libpcre-ocaml [libpcre 6.0.1-2+b1        OCaml bindings for PCRE (runtime)
ii  libpcre3               7.8-3             Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii  libreact-ocaml [librea 0.9.0-2+b1        functional reactive programming in
ii  libssl-ocaml [libssl-o 0.4.4-1           OCaml bindings for OpenSSL (runtim
ii  libssl0.9.8            0.9.8m-2          SSL shared libraries
ii  ocaml-base-nox [ocaml- 3.11.2-1          Runtime system for OCaml bytecode 
ii  procps                 1:3.2.8-8         /proc file system utilities
ii  psmisc                 22.10-1           utilities that use the proc file s

ocsigen recommends no packages.

Versions of packages ocsigen suggests:
pn  ocsigen-dev                   <none>     (no description available)



Reply to: