Bug#574380: edos-distcheck: Wrong output for | alternative?
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:58:03PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> There are cases where some build-essential package is not installable if
> you only look at the Packages file, but where this should be ignored
> because build-essential packages are already installed on the buildd, so
> the installability of their versions in the Packages file is irrelevant.
wasn't that due to the fact that, in the past, one only looked at the
Packages file of available packages, without taking into account
the packages that are already installed on the machine? I thought
that the solution is to feed to edos-builddebcheck the combination of
available packages + installed packages.
-Ralf.
Reply to: