[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?



On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
> could write up a corresponding bug report filed against release.debian.org,
> preferably with proper blocked by[1] annotations if bugs are filed for the
> issues at hand.

Dear -release-rs, thanks for this poll, it is much appreciated to seek
status report from teams which have worked to have their work in
Squeeze!

Regarding the OCaml team, we just went through the OCaml 3.11.2
transition, which has contributed to double-check our new dependency
scheme where linking failures get translated to non co-installable
packages. We do not foresee further OCaml transition before the Debian
Squeeze freeze (assuming, as we hope, it will happen soon-ish :-)).

We still have some small package sub-systems which we would like to get
in Squeeze (most notably some packages related to the Ocsigen web
framework). Assuming the freeze announcement will be posted somewhat in
advance (e.g. 2 weeks), we believe we won't have problems in reaching
the freeze deadline without needing significant unblock requests
afterward.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: