Re: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?

To: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?
From: Stéphane Glondu <steph@glondu.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:56:44 +0100
Message-id: <4B9E126C.30205@glondu.net>
In-reply-to: <20100315101730.GB24471@usha.takhisis.invalid>
References: <20100314204258.GA7840@kelgar.0x539.de> <20100315092039.GB19995@usha.takhisis.invalid> <4B9E00C1.1060002@debian.org> <20100315101730.GB24471@usha.takhisis.invalid>

Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>> I'd like to see Ocsigen 1.3 in Squeeze, as well as the next version of
>> Lwt which should be released soon (I hope). Nurpawiki needs fixing
>> before Ocsigen 1.3 hits unstable (I am working on it).
> 
> Are these so "complicated" (in term of transitioning needs) to deserve
> notifying the release team about them?

I don't think so.

-- 
Stéphane

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?
  - From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Re: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?
  - From: Stéphane Glondu <glondu@debian.org>
- Re: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?
  - From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?
Next by Date: Re: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?
Previous by thread: Re: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?
Next by thread: Re: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread