Re: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?
Hello,
On 15-03-2010, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
>> debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
>
> Dear OCaml-ers,
> I believe we should follow-up on this. AFAICT the major changes we
> wanted to have in Squeeze are already done, so unless there are
> objections I'll followup stating that "we are fine" basically. If others
> want to write the mail, I don't mind, just avoid double postings :-)
>
I am happy with the current state of my OCaml packages.
However, I plan to upgrade some packages:
- dh-ocaml, working on rewriting parts of the policy, should release
this week, hope to have the right policy/reference manual in squeeze.
- bin-prot, new upstream
- sexplib310, new upstream
- ounit, planned new upstream
- ocaml-fileutils, planned new upstream
- ocaml-gettext, planned new upstream
All these changes are minor and should not be a problem for squeeze.
With or without it, we should go.
Regards,
Sylvain Le Gall
Reply to: