Possible problems in your Debian packages
=== matita:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #569391 <http://bugs.debian.org/569391>
matita: FTBFS: /bin/sh: query: not found
= Missing build(s) on alpha hppa s390
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=matita
=== mldonkey:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #569452 <http://bugs.debian.org/569452>
mldonkey: FTBFS: ./configure: line 4843: read: read error: 0: Bad file descriptor
= Missing build(s) on ia64
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mldonkey
=== numerix:
= Missing build(s) on armel sparc
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=numerix
= No migration to testing for 59 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=numerix>
=== ocaml-batteries:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #569455 <http://bugs.debian.org/569455>
ocaml-batteries: FTBFS: Values do not match: val temp_file : ?temp_dir:string -> string -> string -> string
=== pgocaml:
= Lintian: 1 error(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org.html#pgocaml
=== unison:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #517972 <http://bugs.debian.org/517972>
please document -sshargs command-line option
Part of release goal: IPv6 support
=== Packages with a new upstream version according to DEHS:
bibtex2html 1.95 (Debian: 1.94-5)
bin-prot 1.2.21 (Debian: 1.2.20-1)
ocaml-batteries 20090903 (Debian: 0.20090405+beta1-5)
ocaml-sha 1.7 (Debian: 1.6-1)
ocaml-sqlite3 1.5.7 (Debian: 1.5.6-3)
ocaml-ssl 0.4.4 (Debian: 0.4.3-3)
ocamlnet 3.0test1 (Debian: 2.2.9-7)
ocsigen 1.3.0 (Debian: 1.2.2-1)
pgocaml 1.4 (Debian: 1.3-3)
postgresql-ocaml 1.12.3 (Debian: 1.12.1-2)
sexplib310 4.2.17 (Debian: 4.2.16-1)
unison 2.32.52 (Debian: 2.27.57-2)
------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail
We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.
If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe <email>
You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received
this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this
won't remove your PTS subscription.
- ignore <package> <email>
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore <bug> <email>
You will no longer receive information about this bug.
All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.
A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you
believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful
information.
--
DDPOMail,
run by Lucas Nussbaum
Reply to: