Re: Should we remove numerix?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
> I think we should ask for [Numerix] removal, if nobody objects.
+1
- --
Stéphane
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=xYBo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: