[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#546890: marked as done (xmlm - FTBFS: dh_install: libxmlm-ocaml-dev missing files (/usr/lib/ocaml/xmlm/*.o), aborting)



Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:09:00 +0000
with message-id <E1Mo2gO-0007gK-2z@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#546890: fixed in xmlm 1.0.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #546890,
regarding xmlm - FTBFS: dh_install: libxmlm-ocaml-dev missing files (/usr/lib/ocaml/xmlm/*.o), aborting
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
546890: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=546890
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xmlm
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.58.2 (31 Jul 2009) on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu
[...]
> dh_lintian -plibxmlm-ocaml-dev 
> dh_install -plibxmlm-ocaml-dev --sourcedir=debian/tmp --list-missing
> dh_install: libxmlm-ocaml-dev missing files (/usr/lib/ocaml/xmlm/*.o), aborting
> make: *** [binary-install/libxmlm-ocaml-dev] Error 1
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch gave error exit status 2



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xmlm
Source-Version: 1.0.1-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmlm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libxmlm-ocaml-dev_1.0.1-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/x/xmlm/libxmlm-ocaml-dev_1.0.1-4_amd64.deb
xmlm_1.0.1-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xmlm/xmlm_1.0.1-4.diff.gz
xmlm_1.0.1-4.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xmlm/xmlm_1.0.1-4.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 546890@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Romain Beauxis <toots@rastageeks.org> (supplier of updated xmlm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:10:26 -0500
Source: xmlm
Binary: libxmlm-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Romain Beauxis <toots@rastageeks.org>
Description: 
 libxmlm-ocaml-dev - OCaml xml manipulation module
Closes: 546890
Changes: 
 xmlm (1.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * .o file should be installed only when ocamlopt is present..
   Closes: #546890
Checksums-Sha1: 
 4294f26b071a3c63b8b86ee120de47d0f363cc3d 1587 xmlm_1.0.1-4.dsc
 1f9a7bbf6d28ad3ebbceffa0aebc97725cfb0db0 2509 xmlm_1.0.1-4.diff.gz
 ff07e478acaf31298a332f51aa36e86679f93320 167828 libxmlm-ocaml-dev_1.0.1-4_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 77da159f9c6a3f2df521e59180a54cdfef69eac36329b0c475091fc8ddb8b426 1587 xmlm_1.0.1-4.dsc
 f84b787a3fb7829ebe04d9ef282d91ae92b3ff166e9728d9b554bbdc111464ae 2509 xmlm_1.0.1-4.diff.gz
 f42ce6bcff8267722e74c210eea809d771ba1b3c8571278629f5e7b444adaf3c 167828 libxmlm-ocaml-dev_1.0.1-4_amd64.deb
Files: 
 077888a4d00e6218d57625d760f61c5d 1587 devel optional xmlm_1.0.1-4.dsc
 4a0b80776d0dd11537be52751c293ddc 2509 devel optional xmlm_1.0.1-4.diff.gz
 38eac0be3672ba0c2ba062775a916226 167828 ocaml optional libxmlm-ocaml-dev_1.0.1-4_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKsUfDAAoJEAC5aaocqV0ZV6UH/jzEvzs+xm0h7LHzNGFOkRji
5yhk+CyosNbK3lpJ/YNjezGfKWAb8GnZ2PrNmLjE98Jnhsv0VJAmD4CqYqVaXnQu
9lCDAiZHDltfsdAK1AqOXLtMcZw+GXtMEoTcsPIOSqakcI2K2TNktvdE2lY374AU
kekby5UpckokSHSCl8nG1qOyMMgI8qC32CjU8T5jotDAnShH6e+gG2Ev08oUfL4/
BB3sgbs7DSa2DfbJwRs879ZUuGT1LuLVL704BANFJ22AhrhxT13jaZeYW23Ac7tv
n17FalAQXCmRbI2ckrDDnWQdAg2Qce07I/JRqQiZXVcgij2wQhWXlMoJCtGWHgg=
=FLHn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply to: