On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:59:26AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > pkglab depends on non-existing package libledit-ocaml. I guess
> > edos-distcheck could have found it... but... well... fix it, please.
> > This holds up the ocaml transition by the virtue of edos-debcheck
> > in testing breaking by having ocaml-base-nox-3.11.0 to go away,
> > which needs the migration of the new edos-debcheck in testing,
> > which in turn needs edos-distcheck to migrate.
>
> what is going on here? The debian/control file of the ledit source
> package (2.01-4) contains no stanze to create the libledit-ocaml
> package. Has this been removed? If yes, why?
Nope, it contains libledit-ocaml-*dev* (development part of the lib),
as ledit is a pure OCaml library, there is no libledit-ocaml (runtime
part of the lib).
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature