Re: [Fwd: [Pkg-ocaml-maint-commits] [SCM] libfuse-ocaml packaging branch, debian, updated. debian/0.2-1-1-g0b81018]
Romain Beauxis <toots@rastageeks.org> writes:
> Le Sunday 31 May 2009 16:21:58 Mehdi Dogguy, vous avez écrit :
>> On 0, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> wrote:
>> > If it weren't for the Pkg-ocaml-maint policy that all packages are to
>> > be debian packages this would be a native package. It is bad enough
>> > the source is split between 2 git repositories. I'm not going to split
>> > changelogs as well.
>>
>> That's your opinion. I'm waiting for a confirmation from a DD.
>> I doubt any DD will agree with you (on this particular package).
>
> I agree that upstream changelog and debian changelog are two different things.
>
> For our (savonet) modules, we have a seperate changelog for each, and "new
> upstream release" entries.
>
> This is particularly reasonable because you can have several debian packages
> for a single upstream release. For the same reason we request to remove the
> debian/ directory from upstream.
>
> If you want to propose your code to people outside of debian, I think it is
> reasonable to split in two changelogs, hence.
>
>
> Romain
Damn, you are right. Even more work thrust on me on the off chance
that maybe one day RH might want to package libfuse-ocaml and is too
stupid to ignore the debian dir.
MfG
Goswin
Reply to: