On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:21:40AM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: > I have nothing against having lablgtk2 maintained in a git > repository (I have made most of the latest lablgtk2 uploads > excepting the last two which were made respectively by Ralf and > Sylvain). OK then, it seems we can conclude that lablgtk2 should be migrated while hevea should not. > Moreover, I see that there is a new upstream release of lablgtk2. It > would be nice to package it before uploading to experimental, so > that we get a little testing (there shouldn't be any problem though, > the changelog only seems to mention small bugfixes and new > features). Too late for _this_ experimental upload (since I did it yesterday), but nothing prevents to do another upload to experimental with the new upstream ... Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature