On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:21:40AM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> I have nothing against having lablgtk2 maintained in a git
> repository (I have made most of the latest lablgtk2 uploads
> excepting the last two which were made respectively by Ralf and
> Sylvain).
OK then, it seems we can conclude that lablgtk2 should be migrated
while hevea should not.
> Moreover, I see that there is a new upstream release of lablgtk2. It
> would be nice to package it before uploading to experimental, so
> that we get a little testing (there shouldn't be any problem though,
> the changelog only seems to mention small bugfixes and new
> features).
Too late for _this_ experimental upload (since I did it yesterday),
but nothing prevents to do another upload to experimental with the new
upstream ...
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature