Re: omake failures (#510919) (and RFS)
Evgeni Golov a écrit :
>> BTW, there are many things that shouldn't be in the .orig.tar.gz (such
>> as CVS directories, for a start)... For future releases, it might be
>> relevant to repackage the upstream tarball.
>
> Yupp, but thats a different issue, not relevant here and now :)
Sorry for the misinformation... CVS directories were there in the past,
but not any more now :)
>>> And for really closing 510919: could either ocaml-nox or omake provide
>>> a ocamldep-omake symlink, pointing to ocamldep? Just to make sure we
>>> (or actually you :P) don't break any user-scripts.
>> This sounds like a dirty visible hack to me, I don't agree with this
>> proposal. Are there so many people hard-coding ocamldep-omake in their
>> scripts? Doesn't it sound reasonable to force people to update their
>> scripts now?
>
> Dunno if there are people hardcoding it, I don't do any ocaml stuff.
> But you should consider adding a debian/NEWS file, saying
> ocamldep-omake is gone now, so users notice this fact on upgrade and
> not when their stuff is failing.
Done.
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
Reply to: