[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RFC: how to push the fix for #503616



On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:57:54PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
> > t-p-u is a workaround so should only be used if unstable is no option.
> > So if posssible, please use use unstable.
> 
> Actually, there might be a problem because of libpcre3...

Erm, I was in fact fearing some entanglement, that's why I asked for
t-p-u (even though I didn't check to discover libpcre3 in advance).

ocamlnet 2.2.9-4 is now in unstable, with urgency high, built on all
arch waiting for an unblock *and* for pcre3 to transition.

Is pcre3 going to be transitioned?
If yes please unblock ocamlnet 2.2.9-4 as well.
If not please let me know if I'd go for t-p-u with ocamlnet 2.2.9-4.

TIA,
Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è sempre /oo\ All one has to do is hit the right
uno zaino        -- A.Bergonzoni \__/ keys at the right time -- J.S.Bach

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: