[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#503616: libapache2-mod-ocamlnet: mod_netcgi_apache.so will not load



Package: libapache2-mod-ocamlnet
Version: 2.2.9-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I installed libapache2-mod-ocamlnet and enabled the module using "a2enmod
netcgi_apache". Apache 2 no longer starts, printing this message instead:

Starting web server: apache2apache2: Syntax error on line 187 of
/etc/apache2/apache2.conf: Syntax error on line 1 of
/etc/apache2/mods-enabled/netcgi_apache.load: Cannot load
/usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_netcgi_apache.so into server:
libcamlrun_shared.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
 failed!

I tried to resolve the problem by:

1. Saving /usr/lib/ocaml/3.10.2 to /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ocaml.conf
2. Running ldconfig
3. Running /etc/init.d/apache2 start

I now get this error:

Starting web server: apache2apache2: Syntax error on line 187 of
/etc/apache2/apache2.conf: Syntax error on line 1 of
/etc/apache2/mods-enabled/netcgi_apache.load: Cannot load
/usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_netcgi_apache.so into server:
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.10.2/libcamlrun_shared.so: undefined symbol: sqrt
 failed!

I'm not sure how to proceed from here.

Thanks,
Dave Benjamin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libapache2-mod-ocamlnet depends on:
ii  apache2.2-common          2.2.8-1        Next generation, scalable, extenda
ii  libc6                     2.7-8          GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libncurses5               5.6+20080203-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libocamlnet-ocaml-dev     2.2.9-3        OCaml application-level Internet l

libapache2-mod-ocamlnet recommends no packages.

libapache2-mod-ocamlnet suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Reply to: