[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Request for comment: status of Ubuntu's packages



[ Forwarded message from David Mentre, which for some yet to be
discovered reasons is unable to post to Debian OCaml Maint
list. David: of course until the problem is solved feel free to Cc me
on your replies, I'll proxy them to the list ]

----- Forwarded message from David MENTRE <david.mentre@gmail.com> -----

Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:18:56 +0200
From: David MENTRE <dmentre@linux-france.org>
To: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Request for comment: status of Ubuntu's packages

Hello,

I've tried to adapt the web page showing status of OCaml packages on
Debian to Ubuntu. I've tried two approaches:

 1. A page with only Ubuntu packages. This is patch
    ocaml-debian-status-ubuntu-only.patch attached.

    Sample:
     http://bentobako.org/tmp/ubuntu-only/debian-ocaml-status.html

 2. A page with mixed Debian and Ubuntu packages. This is patch
    ocaml-debian-status-mixed.patch attached[1].

    Sample:
     http://bentobako.org/tmp/mixed/debian-ocaml-status.html

In fact, I'm not satisfied with both approaches. 

The first one is cleaner: I've taken care of putting the right Launchpad
link for the source package and the Intrepid packages are not masked by
testing ones. But is lacks comparison with Debian packages.

The mixed approach offers comparison between Debian and Ubuntu packages,
but the policy "only the "best" version, i.e. the one nearest to a
release, is reported" makes most of Intrepid packages masked by testing.

Moreover, there is probably the equivalent of
testing/unstable/experimental for hardy, intrepid, ... This is not
integrated yet.

I'm wondering if it would not be better to represent quintuplets
(source, ocaml_version, version, distro, sub_distro) in some ways. E.g.
 (ara, v3.10.0, 1.0.22, hardy, backports)
 (ara, v3.10.2, 1.0.25, debian, testing)

Any comment is welcomed.

Sincerely yours,
david


Footnotes: 
[1]  I had to change the way retrieve-data.sh names files, because
     Ubuntu has release names with '-' in them, like hardy-backports.

-- 
GPG/PGP key: A3AD7A2A David MENTRE <dmentre@linux-france.org>
 5996 CC46 4612 9CA4 3562  D7AC 6C67 9E96 A3AD 7A2A

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the
XML stuff is so ... simplistic  -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time


Reply to: