Re: ocamlp3l_2.03-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:09:42AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> >> rejected, seems we miss the source for the included papers/hlpp05/*.
> > Come on Joerg, are you really saying that you need the sources of the
> > scientific papers included in the tarball ? This is not plain
> > documentation but scientific papers, and as thus, it seem normal to not
> > provide the sources.
>
> Yes, I say that we need the sources of everything we upload.
So, this applies also to the bunch of remaining linux kernel firmware
which will be removed before the lenny release, as well as the non-free
GPL copyright document ? Or numerous other problematic cases in the
archive ?
Sven Luther
Reply to: