Re: ocamlp3l_2.03-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:33:39PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:50:21PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Come on Joerg, are you really saying that you need the sources of the
> > scientific papers included in the tarball ? This is not plain
> > documentation but scientific papers, and as thus, it seem normal to not
> > provide the sources.
>
> No, it is not normal.
Oh, and you pobably provide the latex sources of your scientific
articles ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: