On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 12:23:28PM +0200, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> I think that ocaml-debian-support will be a more generic name, since in
> the description there is a CDBS class and the policy -- which has
> nothing related to debhelper.
"dh" is not a trademark of debhelper, indeed the current short
description reads "helper tools for maintaining OCaml-related Debian
packages". Before settling down with that I've pondered about
"ocaml-support" which was way too generic, and about your proposal too,
which I considered too long.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the
XML stuff is so ... simplistic -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature